November 30, 2012 · 12:08 pm
Henry Lincoln Blog
|This story is true… Only the facts have been changed.||Posted on: Wed Dec 30 2009|
|I have promised to say a little more about Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code. Here then, are some not-too-serious observations:
Both novel and not-very-successful film were entertaining rubbish, but I found it slightly irritating that Mr Brown seemed to be implying that he has based his story upon accurate facts. I can’t comment on his ideas about Leonardo, or Opus Dei … but, for Pierre Plantard – the Priory of Sion – Jesus – Mary Magdalene – and so on, I can only say: “Facts?!!? I’d love to see your sources, Honeybunch.“The Priory of Sion, Mr Brown tells us, is “a real organisation”? Really? Who says so? (And that’s a pertinent question.) “… Paris’s Bibliothèque Nationale,” he claims, “discovered parchments known as Les Dossiers Secrets …”
Oh, I give up! The Bibliothèque Nationale has never ‘discovered’ anything – and the Dossiers Secrets are not ‘parchments’.
I could go on … All or any of these ideas should be perfectly acceptable in a work of fiction – but here they are loudly proclaimed to be truths, and millions of people have been seriously misled and continue fervently to believe in the veracity of Mr Brown’s fantasies.
However, I felt that, being committed to the reality of Rennes-le-Château, I would now find ‘playing with it’ rather uncomfortable. But I was sure that someone, some day, would see the possibilities. True, I know a great deal more about the subject than does Mr Brown, but some of his story-telling techniques seem to me to be more than a little laboured and he has missed some splendid chances.
I consider his principle failure, though, to lie in his choice of hero. All right … he has two excuses. First, he’d already, I understand, introduced the character in an earlier book and wanted to use him again. Understandable. But his story and its main setting lie in France. This American character doesn’t ‘belong’- he’s the proverbial ‘sore thumb’. Though – and here’s Brown’s second excuse – if you want Hollywood to show interest, you must have an American leading man.
For those of you who are not aware of this fact, ‘Cajun’ is all that remains of the original name ‘Arcadian’. They were the dwellers in Arcadia – the country which Nicolas Fouquet – (King Louis XIV’s Minister of Finance) – had attempted to establish in Canada. And Fouquet, remember, had learned “a secret which kings would have pains to draw from him”.
Even without exploring the idea any further, it’s possible to see how much more satisfying – and true to its origins – the story could have become … and with a genuinely American leading man – and music – to boot!