March 8, 2013
Promiscuity is not only due to conformity to occult norms,
as I wrote Friday.
Alexandra Fox says women will do anything for acceptance and love,
even if it kills them.
Social engineers knew women are much more psychologically penetrable and easily led. (This is not sexism, it’s neuroscience – they are easier to sell to, to hypnotize, and even to train as MK Ultra slaves, as certain facts of female neurology make them more suggestible and less resistant.)
by Alexandra Fox
Young women don’t behave promiscuously because they enjoy it, or because they want cash or career benefit – but simply because they want what women have always wanted – acceptance.
And the deafening social message is that they will only get this acceptance through being promiscuous.
It’s cool, sophisticated, liberated, and, above all else, confirmation of the only female trait that matters any more – “hotness”.
If a woman can get a drunken stranger to fall into bed with her, she must be pretty “hot”, right?
After all, drunk young men wouldn’t sleep with just anyone, would they?!
Women at once believe sex means nothing – you can do it with anyone, any time, anywhere – but also that it means everything. It’s not about being pretty or beautiful any more. These terms seem quaint. It’s specifically “hotness” – sex appeal – that women use to measure and market themselves.
This is why we now have 13-year-old girls dispensing sexual favors to boys at parties, and educated young women taking up careers in lap-dancing.
Female identity has been so warped and shattered by cultural Marxism that women conceive of themselves as sexual utilities – available to anyone who wants to use them.
There are no preconditions for this – no emotional connection, respect, or love required. They don’t even have to enjoy it. As your article says, the only important thing is that they can “claim the act”. They can wear it like some kind of twisted “badge of dishonour”.
SATANISM CELEBRATES SICKNESS
HBO’s “Girls”confirms that young women are taught to celebrate being promiscuous disease-ridden emotional wrecks with neither marital nor career prospects. A memorable line was that catching an STD was the “ultimate mark of an adventurous woman”.
This is how the programming works – women are made to do things which are blatantly self-destructive, which literally make them ill, and then told it makes them “cool” – e.g. accepted.
Similarly, the contraceptive pill is considered at once a modern, liberated “woman’s right”, but also a class one carcinogen. In addition, many studies link abortion with breast cancer, and show how abortions are far more of a threat to female mental health than continuing with the pregnancy.
Despite all this – and despite the fact that all these things are destructive — women keep doing them; because even more than health, happiness or sanity, women want to be accepted.
Social engineers know this, which is precisely why they created feminism and not meninism. In theory, social engineers wishing to break up the family could just as easily have used feminist rhetoric to appeal to men:
“Men! Don’t sacrifice the best years of your life as a slave to your wife and children! Don’t work yourself to the bone for the sake of those parasites! You have a right to enjoy your youth and freedom! You have been enslaved by the matriarchy!!!”
But they didn’t, because they knew it wouldn’t work. It would work on women, because women are much more psychologically penetrable and easily led. (This is not sexism, it’s neuroscience – they are easier to sell to, to hypnotize, and even to train as MK Ultra slaves, as certain facts of female neurology make them more suggestible and less resistant.)
Also, women are now so loaded with toxic insecurity about their “hotness” that they need to keep getting “hits” of sex to reassure themselves that men still find them attractive, e.g. that they’re worth something. They pretend to have “high sex drives”, but scratch below the surface and they will quite happily admit “I like to have a lot of sex because it makes me feel desirable and wanted”. They don’t particularly like sex. They just like – need – the idea that someone wants them.
So now, we are where we are. Generations of girls with shattered self-esteem who can’t conceive of themselves other than as syndicated receptacles for strangers’ drunken lusts. We can only live in hope that girls will start to see how badly this has destroyed older generations, start to question feminist “wisdom”, and reclaim their lives, health and dignity back.